X-Andrew-Authenticated-as: 7997;andrew.cmu.edu;Ted Anderson
Received: from corsica.andrew.cmu.edu via trymail for +dist+/afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr1/ota/space/space.dl@andrew.cmu.edu (->+dist+/afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr1/ota/space/space.dl) (->ota+space.digests)
ID </afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr1/ota/Mailbox/MYpe0eu00UkVQAl04=>;
In article <SHAFER.89Jul20132937@drynix.dfrf.nasa.gov> shafer@elxsi.dfrf.nasa.gov (Mary Shafer) writes:
>... Just speaking personally, as a fairly
>frequent flier, I'd really prefer that fighters be limited-distribution
>items. There are enough things to worry about, without worrying about
>some yahoo out there in an F-something with sidewinders at my 747's six.
Anybody with any sense who wants to shoot down your 747 will just hang
the Sidewinders on a Learjet -- less conspicuous, and perfectly adequate
performance for the job. (You can hang Sidewinders on almost anything.)
>...I have some real definite opinions about required
>piloting skills. We require our test pilots to fly a minimum of 200
>hours per year, with specified minimums for each aircraft, to maintain
>proficiency. That F-86 driver had very low total time, low jet time,
>and was what I'd consider non-current...
>Just because you can afford an airplane, doesn't mean you can fly it.
I have no quarrel with the idea that anyone who owns his own jet fighter
needs to be properly qualified to fly it. I see no reason why a civilian
is incapable of acquiring the qualifications, though.
>... I don't know why those posters who despise the government and all
>its fruits are panting to buy those fruits. Let's see some consistancy...
If a private market in such things were allowed, we wouldn't have to buy
things designed by the government. Which sort of brings us back to
spaceflight, since that's the big problem with space launchers too...
--
1961-1969: 8 years of Apollo. | Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
1969-1989: 20 years of nothing.| uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 89 06:27:34 EDT
From: dsc@osteocyber.ortho.hmc.psu.edu (david s. channin)
Subject: Don't Mess with NASA (afterburners)
>Me too! Unfortunately the US military wants to keep jet aviation all to
>itself, so even its tamer aircraft are never sold to civilians. (Both
>the Starfighter and the T-38 were rebuilt from hardware that slipped out
>basically by accident.)
Hypothetical Question:
Let's say you just happen to have hit the PA state lottery last April, and walked away with $115 Million. You will receive 5.75 M for 20 years. You save diligently for 6 -7 years. What are the laws, regulations, etc (if any) that prevent you from doing the following:
1. Walk into the Northrop offices in wherever.
2. Pull out a bank check for x million dollars.
3. Say,``I'd would like that nice T-38 that's in the showroom''.
4. Fly away with same after filling the tank. (assuming you already have a license).
Why wouldn't this scenario work?? (or would it?).
dsc@osteocyber.ortho.hmc.psu.edu
David S. Channin
Research Fellow
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery
Pennsylvania State University
College of Medicine
The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
717 - 531 - 6698
------------------------------
Date: 20 Jul 89 16:46:03 GMT
From: leech@apple.com (Jonathan Patrick Leech)
Subject: Re: NASA Select Broadcasts
In article <4980@mtuxo.att.com> tee@mtuxo.att.com (54317-T.EBERSOLE) writes:
>also with no luck. Has anyone been able to find NASA Select's broadcasts?
>Did you need to know anything more than the data in the excerpted paragraph?
>Is this bird viewable from the east coast with "standard" equipment, i.e.,
>is it a good quality signal or very weak?
I tuned in SELECT numerous times from UNC-Chapel Hill, which has a
pretty good view of F2R. While I'm no expert on satellite TV, both I
and our communications director had trouble getting a good signal.
Generally we had to fiddle with the skew setting of the receiver and
nudge the antenna back and forth. It seemed to be best ~2 degrees
further east than the claimed position, in general.
--
Jon Leech (leech@apple.com)
Apple Integrated Systems
__@/
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 89 10:17:57 PST
From: Peter Scott <PJS@grouch.JPL.NASA.GOV>
Subject: New satellite of Neptune
X-Vms-Mail-To: EXOS%"space@andrew.cmu.edu"
Excerpted without permission from NASA _Voyager Bulletin_, Mission Status
Report No. 88, July 12:
ADD A NEW NEPTUNIAN MOON
A new moon has been discovered orbiting Neptune. Temporarily designated
1989 N1, the new moon was initially seen in images transmitted to Earth
by Voyager 2 in mid-June. Its existence was confirmed upon examination
of other images after the moon's orbital motion had been calculated and
its position could be predicted.
The new Neptunian satellite could range in diameter from 200 to 600 km (about
125 to 400 miles) and oribts in a very nearly circular and equatorial orbit
about 92,700 km (about 57,600 mi) from the planet's cloud tops (or about
117,500 km) (73,000 mi) from the planet's center).
A permanent name will be given to the moon at a later date by the International
Astronomical Union (IAU).
According to Dr. Stephen P. Synnott, a Voyager imaging team scientist at
JPL, the satellite appeared as a small, bright smudge in Voyager pictures
due to the long (46-second) exposure. At this point, the moon is too
indistinct to appear in photographic prints made from the Voyager images.
Pictures taken in coming weeks will show the moon more clearly.
1989 N1 cannot be seen from Earth because the moon is so close to Neptune
that the brightness of the planet itself masks the tiny point of light.
Voyager 2 will continue to study the moon and will conduct searches for
others on approach to the planet. [...]
The moon orbits well outside the orbits of the postulated ring arcs. Its
existence lessens concerns about radiation hazards to the spacecraft near
the planet, since the moon probably sweeps charged particles out of the
area as it orbits Neptune.
Peter Scott (pjs@grouch.jpl.nasa.gov, speaking only for myself)
------------------------------
Date: 21 Jul 89 23:17:43 GMT
From: vsi1!v7fs1!add@ames.arc.nasa.gov (Andrew D. Daniel)
Subject: Re: S-Band Beacon on Moon
In article <138@nwnexus.WA.COM> edm@nwnexus.WA.COM (Ed Morin) writes:
>wjc@XN.LL.MIT.EDU (Bill Chiarchiaro) writes:
>"Unix Public Access for the Masses!"
Now Ed, lets enforce the consitutional separation of church and (solid) state.
--
Andrew D Daniel, Video Seven, Inc. Angels fear to tread